Voting Rights Act Section 4

The decision is being seen as a challenge to the mission of the voting rights act passed in 1965.
Voting rights act section 4. Section 4 a of the act established a formula to identify those areas and to provide for more stringent remedies where appropriate. Section 4 of the voting rights act when congress enacted the voting rights act of 1965 it determined that racial discrimination in voting had been more prevalent in certain areas of the country. It was signed into law by president lyndon b.
A state and all of its political subdivisions shall be subject to preclearance of voting practice changes for a 10 year period if 1 15 or more voting rights violations occurred in the state during the previous 25 years. Designed to enforce the voting rights guaranteed by the. Holder decision a key part of the voting rights act because it provided a formula for the federal government to use in identifying.
Code switch after the supreme court ruled a key provision of the voting rights act unconstitutional champions of the law said congress. The voting rights act of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the united states that prohibits racial discrimination in voting. The court overturned section 4 of the act in a 5 4 decision split along ideological lines.
June 25 2013 section 5 of the voting rights act has essentially been nullified by a major decision from the supreme court. The supreme court struck down section 4 of the voting rights act on tuesday the provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of the country must have changes to their voting laws cleared by the federal government or in federal court. Section 4 is or was before the shelby county v.
Johnson during the height of the civil rights movement on august 6 1965 and congress later amended the act five times to expand its protections. Voting rights act section 4 struck down by supreme court. 1973 to 1973aa 6 is an important federal civil rights law that protects minorities from discriminatory voting practices initially the vra only protected racial minorities but in 1975 congress extended its protections to members of languages minorities including voters who speak spanish native american languages.
Or 2 10 or more violations occurred during the previous 25 years at least one of which was committed by the state itself. In a 5 4 vote the court struck down a formula at the heart of the voting rights act the landmark 1965 law that required certain states and localities with a history of discrimination against. The supreme court struck down section 4 of the voting rights act on tuesday the provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of the country must have changes to their voting laws cleared by the federal government or in federal court.